I do have two different versions of "Question of Balance". I'm getting older so no longer hear above 16kHz, so that means 320 kbps mp3 is pretty much transparent to me, as well as v0 vbr mp3. One is the MFSL version which I loved. Fleetwood Mac - Rumours - 45 RPM Vinyl Record. There were two Marantz SACD players I was keeping my eye on: the 30n ($2999) and the SA-KI Ruby Signature player with DAC ($3999). . " CD or SACD vs Vinyl. Music; Vinyl Records; 45 RPM Vinyl Record; Fleetwood Mac - Rumours. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. I'm generally rather selective about my SACD purchases and only have about 25-30SACD recordings now although I plan to order a lot more as more and more reissues come out. If you like those genres then I can support jumping into SACD's in 2022. So far I had different results. sacd vs other formats IGNORED sacd vs other formats. While the standard CD format is tied to a 44. SACD vs. I guess it shows you how much cheaper. SACD (white) vs Bluray (blue) The pressing quality of 2022 vinyl is not always perfect, but often a wash will solve the problem. 192 is significantly better and DXD (352) is even better. There are also the hybrid SACD discs from AP but I am not as familiar with those. Moody Blues "Question of bal. gloomrider, Feb 20, 2014 #177. On the vinyl, the violin and the acoustic rhythm guitar lay back a bit, and there's a slightly rounded-off, woody tone to the drumming and the bass, and a very, very subtle tunneled, recessed quality to the vocals. This is why CDs sample sound at 44. 1 2 Page 2 of 2 Parrot Heritage Members 6. 0:39 - Stereo SACD Layer3. Or that only some PS3s do SACD?neverbe said: ↑. . " For classical I prefer SACD due to the format's running time though. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. . Both needed to be set up properly and tracked at their maximum rated vertical tracking force. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Another 3 SACD set, and, if truth be told, my favourite ESOTERIC reissue. This music does not sound shrill in the concert hall, and it doesn’t here. View entire discussion. 1447) Join Date Dec 2011 Location Tynemouth, England Posts 2,457 Mentioned 43 Post(s)SACD vs. Instrumental and vocal decay became more and more discernible and authentic. So, out of sheer desperation, I ordered the standard US CD from Amazon. SACD vs. On the vinyl, the violin and the acoustic rhythm guitar lay back a bit, and there's a slightly rounded-off, woody tone to the drumming and the bass, and a very, very subtle tunneled, recessed quality to the vocals. Virtual Systems Let the world see what you've built. Audiogon The world's largest high-end audio community. . I don't know which is more truthful. I sampled a bunch of SACDs and kept finding differences that were attributable to different mastering. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Even better than the regular SACD with even clearer presentation. Vinyl. . #4. but really no. I don't know which is more truthful. I just don't have many detailed DVD-Audio discs. Shawn, Dec 8, 2012. The quantization noise floor for 16-bit digital audio (the CD standard) is -96 dB, each bit yielding 6 dB of headroom between the noise floor and the ceiling. After an extensive shoot-out lasting 53 hours, I'm. tlake6659 said: ↑. #6. . Details;SACD VS Vinyl for Jazz and Classical Well, I've been thinking of getting into vinyl for a while now but still haven't done it. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me. They actually already did this when comparing SACD vs. I'm generally rather selective about my SACD purchases and only have about 25-30SACD recordings now although I plan to order a lot more as more and more reissues come out. About 2 years ago, I decided to get back into vinyl. for making the SACD version, and instead they CHOSE James Guthrie, who was an engineer producing, e. Much better sense of the recording environment, echos. Show Printable Version; 12-12-2012, 03:54 AM #31. Thank you. Please, bear in mind that I have NO original vinyls to compare to, only the early CDs of Shake It Up and Greatest Hits: 1) Shake It Up - the worse pressing from the three. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Some may prefer the analog warmth and tactile nature of vinyl, while others. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. Third - Single side Japanese SACD . however you need to be extra careful as there are many SACDs where the MultiCh content is not only distinct in being a different mix but a different mastering from the Stereo and that Stereo version can often just be a recycling of the current CD remaster the label had at the. But CDs are fine. SACD Specifications. Description. You just know the SACD layer is going to be upsampled at some point. So, Changes CD is DR 12 and Changes SACD is DR 11. You're comparing a fully mature fomat (vinyl) with what, 80 years of development behind it, to one with 4 years or so. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. They also don’t degrade with each playback, unlike analog records. Yours may be different. CD - page 2 Filters for SACD and DVD-Audio . The choice between the two depends on personal preferences and the desired sonic attributes. Moody Blues "Question of bal. . The band did NOT like it at all. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. In-Stock Music Orders Over $99 SHIP FREE Within The Continental U. SACD. Vinyl. New items New comments Author list Series Latest content Latest updates Latest reviews. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. Kyhl, Aug 10, 2022 #19652. I personally wouldn't get either. SACD disc and the DSD encoding (on a SACD) are a "frozen in time" tech circa 2005. Newly remastered by Bernie Grundman, from the original analog master tapes! Includes both mono and stereo mixes — Pure DSD sound! *cd layer contains stereo mix only. Vinyl. SACD vs. I do have two different versions of "Question of Balance". I like SACD as a format, but it's kind of pointless for me when nothing I listen to is on it, and the few things that may peak my interest (i. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. However, I have tested the EQ of my cartridge and phono stage and in all the following examples, that EQ has been reversed out of the vinyl samples so that what we're comparing is the true EQ of what's in the LP groove. The Analogue Productions SACD of Pink Floyd ‘s The Dark Side of the Moon is finally shipping after a long wait. I'm generally rather selective about my SACD purchases and only have about 25-30SACD recordings now although I plan to order a lot more as more and more reissues come out. Boy, what a difference. Even if. Data read from an SHM CD is no different to the data red from an ordinary CD. #13. One of the fun things about this hobby is screwing around. It also provides a higher bit rate and longer. When it comes to the debate of cardioid vs super cardioid for live. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. #4. My Soft Parade pressing actually sounds quite good: The Doors – The Soft Parade (1970, Terre Haute Pressing, Gatefold, Vinyl) Chrome_Head, Jun 9, 2021. Oh yeah, Aimee Mann and Vanessa Fernandez too, that would be the newest. redbook vs. ssmith3046, Nov 28, 2012 #4. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. Vinyl. . 45 RPM 200 Gram Clarity Vinyl. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. The individual versions will be available on September 16, 2022 with the Deluxe version available from October 7, 2022. The presence of the CD layer shouldn't affect at all (at least in principle) the reading of the SACD layer. Virtual. just WAY better than either the Blu-Spec CD or regular CD. Madman Across the Water SACD vs CD vs LP. I have SACD that beats my vinyl and vice versa. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. First, All music is on Vinyl. SACD VS Vinyl for Jazz and Classical Well, I've been thinking of getting into vinyl for a while now but still haven't done it. Great sounding discs are much, much more frequent than on redbook, and it comes with none of the hassles of vinyl attached, plus you can rip the redbook layer and take it with you. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. Along with LPs, SACDs, reel-to-reel tape and other forms of high-quality audio. The category "Outstanding" doesn't mean audiophile sound, but outstanding quality compared to original pressings. Pour a glass or cup of your preference and press play. If you like SACDs, the 2004 reissue of Relaxin’ by the Miles Davis Quintet sounds equally fantastic, albeit a little different with a brighter high end and more noticeable amounts of tape hiss. Roxanne Joncas Soundstage determines the stereo image width you perceive between the speakers. 1kHz/16-bit digital audio is indistinguishable from high-resolution digital. In other forum in Madrid we have carried out the test with the Stereophile material and I'm anxious to know if yo have done the same overhere and what results you have obtained. Quick links. We really need to move on, but SACD and DVD-A and BluRay have so far not killed the Red Book standard disc. Location: Daejeon. "No matter how high a sampling rate is," Wired's. Inner ear, May 11, 2017 #5. Shawn, Dec 8, 2012. I own the SHM-SACD of Who's Next along with CD's mastered by Doug Sax & our host. . Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. but for every song, the DR value is "one less" on the SACD vs CD. However, I have tested the EQ of my cartridge and phono stage and in all the following examples, that EQ has been reversed out of the vinyl samples so that what we're comparing is the true EQ of what's in the LP groove. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Cardioid microphones are a good choice for general-purpose recording and live sound reinforcement, while supercardioid microphones are better suited for more challenging environments where there is a lot of ambient noise and the sound source needs to be isolated more tightly. Vinyl. Two channel SACD just blew away the CD's, while hybrids were not out yet I had albums that I had both the CD and the SACD to compare. Still waiting form "Brothers in Arms" on SACD I have also ordered the MoFi vinyl releases of: "Love Over Gold", "Dire Straits" and "Brothers in Arms" I look forward to comparing SACD vs Vinyl *reelspin* My thought process is I should buy them while they are relatively new and prices have not reached $200+ each yet. My DCC is definitly better. Fred Dender and Grampire like this. It sounds manipulated and phony. With a storage capacity of 4. bmpnyc. The string attack, decay, soundstage, and imaging are way ahead of the SACD. This opinion is based on over 2 dozen CD, SACD/CD players and transport/DACS I've heard here over the past 18 months. SHM-SACD vs Original LP/Original LP-rip, Original CD and other reissues. . Tom Favata, Apr 9, 2021. Recent MoFi controversy spurred me to compare sound of MoFi Vinyl to CD, SACD to CD, DSD to FLAC. Tony van Veen is the CEO of DIY Media Group, the parent company of Disc Makers and BookBaby. This first example compares MoFi' s Music From Big Pink - LP vs. I have the five Steve Wilson blu-ray audio 5. jmtd. The gap. DJM CD very excellent as is the MCA clone mastering of the DJM. On the other hand, vinyl’s sound stage remains unbeaten, as the ClearAudio parallel arm. " CD or SACD vs Vinyl. But when I compare the same piece issued both on SACD and vinyl (Channel Records, Pentatone), SACD carries the day by a whisker: a touch airier, a slightly truer tone and yes, an even better “flow” that facilitate following the musical argument. The other thing to keep in mind is that SACD is a format in its infancy. Please, bear in mind that I have NO original vinyls to compare to, only the early CDs of Shake It Up and Greatest Hits: 1) Shake It Up - the worse pressing from the three. The SHM-SACD is still a good option because it doesn't have CSG processing. My reluctance in getting a transport has many reasons, the main being my investment in vinyl, but I did need to find a link to my CDs. Vinyl. Whilst many (recent) multichannel SACDs are more about ambience, others are about using the system to provide an immersive sound (e. Some vinyl is very quiet while others are not . New posts Search forums. I much prefer CD to SACD. The best of both worlds is vinyl ripped on a very high end rig in High res and then converted to DSD. SACD. • UHQR Vinyl Record. Denon - DCD-A110 SACD/CD Player. I collect and have sizable collection of vinyl from 23 years of solid collecting. The most notable proof of this is the CD4 quadraphonic system which relied on a 45 kHz bandwidth. Posted April 21, 2010. A SACD does sound better then a redbook CD. Share Jun 15, 2007 at 8:50 AM Post #29 of 33 Forest Design 100+ Head-Fier. The RCA CD of Respighi’s Pines of Rome opens with a wall of sound plastered along the frontal plane of the speakers. SACD vs. Noone else has a date. Dec 10, 2005. On LPs, it’s 30 dB at best. The title best known is Miles/Blue. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. Moody Blues "Question of bal. This is really about "The Downward Spiral" re-release. However, I think it's still too early to answer this question even with identically mastered sources recorded and played back on state-of-the-art equipment optimized for. SACD vs. Two of the discs were mastered in MQA and two were SACD. The SHM concept is nonsense , its no different to those magic markers that you were supposed to color the edges of your CD's with. 4) Making Movies - muted, no drum slam, muted highs. In the vinyl vs. Today we are proud to announce a brand. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. Like the DVD, SACD was a dual-layer format, but instead of one or two high-density layers, the SACD could have a high-density layer and a CD-compatible layer, so the. SACD obviously has an advantage on portability and probably overall SQ - but that's still subjective as I might enjoy the "colorization" of vinyl more. There is some technology that JVC uses to make the. . 2. The "Mastertape" version though more detailed and seemingly purer sounds flatter in eq. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. The vinyl appears to be analogue mastered so if you value an all-analogue chain that would be an advantage. So here the thing, i've listen to both Vinyl's CD's and SACD's im trying to see if there's really difference. True. But most of us here are comfortable and familiar with it. An independent musician needs to make CDs Disc replication vs. IMHO. I own the Nautalus half-speed master from the 70's and owned the SACD. Check the numbers; audiophiles have voted decisively with their wallets for vinyl. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. Audiogon The world's largest high-end audio community. I have plenty of other SACDs in my collection that. The difference between DSD and the source vinyl was very, very slight and I am not sure I could tell the difference on any given day. SACD’s technical advantages, high resolution, dynamic range, and low noise. of the Dark Side of the Moon, is NOT good sonically. MusicDirect offers 140 titles on SACD and another 20 or so. We do plan on releasing a limited run of virgin vinyl 45rpm pressings—probably 500 pieces—sometime next month if we’re able. meatballz. One is the MFSL version which I loved. 1 kHz sampling rate, SACD samples at 2. Then I bought the new SACD version. I think I'll go Classic Records Vinyl at least for the first three albums, possibly "Passion" and "Us" too because those are also analog recordings also if I remember correctly. I do have two different versions of "Question of Balance". I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. By meatballz August 2, 2011 in General Hi-Fi Discussion. SACD debate, there is no definitive answer to which format offers the ultimate listening experience. SteelyTom likes this. the HDCD, the single-layer SACD, the MFSL SACD and vinyl, the Audio Fidelity vinyl, and the RSD candy-colored 150-numbered-limited pressing. In the world of high-fidelity audio, two formats have stood the test of time and continue to captivate audiophiles: SACD (Super Audio CD) and vinyl records. The question of whether SACD sounds better is subjective and nuanced. I think there's some digital filtering. Yes, but SACD's extend far above redbook. According to a theorem called. On the other hand, Vinyl records have a larger dynamic range than SACDs, which means that they can accurately reproduce louder and softer sounds. Endymion, Apr 22, 2015. The SACD vs. Location: West Hollywood, CA and Inverness, IL. The discs are digitally identical and will sound exactly the same no matter what some snake oil lovers will tell you. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. It sounds great; a very good remastering job. . I've heard many great sounding redbook cd's and I've heard some horrible vinyl. Add to Cart. SACD vs. Yes. The ABCX-758A/B as mentioned above is my favorite. But I don't have an LP with the exact same mastering as an SACD so I can't do any type of apples-to-apples comparison (and even then equipment comes in to play). (2014 Mercury BluRay 0602537736973) Allman Brothers Band-Brothers and Sisters (2014 MFSL SACD HR UDSACD 2103) Allman Brothers Band-Eat A Peach (2004 Mecury SACD HR B0002439-36) Allman Brothers Band-Eat a. SACD tend to be level adjusted a bit higher than other formats,so will sound more impressive on a A/B comparison. garfish. 1 kHz setup. 1:17 - Stereo CD Layer4. Way. Vinyl. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. Fred Dender and Grampire like this. General observations: * The Who - SHM-SACD is quite clean - I can easily move in and out of each track within each song so there is vg clarity. KevinP, May 21, 2009 #52. in May of 1967, one week before Sgt. With a storage capacity of 4. But again, I'd love to be proven wrong. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. The latest in this long history is a double-blind test that, the authors conclude, demonstrates that 44. Quote: Originally Posted by FenderP To me, it's not about formats. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. CD, SACD vs LP, Vinyl, Album#CD #vinyl #hifiFor those of you who have not seen my complete music room and system tour and LP, CD SACD tour please click on th. So far my favorites from each format are as follows: SACD: Eric Clapton - Journeyman DVD-A: Fleetwood Mac - Rumors DVD (Dolby Digital/DTS): Eagles. I think my buying strategy just morphed into buying a few LPs which I really want and then stocking up on the less expensive SACDs, particularly if the. Then I bought the new SACD version. . OTOH, there are many recordings from the 60s, 70s, and 80s that are of poor sound quality. . The choice between the two depends on personal preferences and the desired. . The Analogue Productions SACD of Pink Floyd ‘s The Dark Side of the Moon is finally shipping after a long wait. The answer to that question is a qualified yes. The overall mastering job is superior on the Abkco releases and the detail is greater on both the SACD and vinyl reissuses. I would think that the Vinyl will sound better than the standard CD. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. The RCA CD of Respighi’s Pines of Rome opens with a wall of sound plastered along the frontal plane of the speakers. I want the best sound. My favourite Mix of Dark Side of the Moon is a Bootleg believe it or not , The Alan Parsons Original Quadrophonic Mix. It came as a total shock to me, since I heard so many people claim that SACD is mostly an overkill for the human ear. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. . When it comes to listening to music, there are two main formats that audiophiles swear by: SACD players and vinyl. Limited Edition Numbered SACD CMOB 2260 SA $29. Also, instead of a 16-bit depth, it uses a 1-bit depth. Vinyl. The MoFi also has surface noise,while the Abkco vinyl is near silent. Thread Tools. Edit; I forgot I have one. One more thing. I sampled a bunch of SACDs and kept finding differences that were attributable to different mastering and. " CD or SACD vs Vinyl. Also, do you think SACD has good future in the massive market? I also posted this thread in the "digital" seecion, sorry about that but some people only enter to this section. Following a change in how Billboard counts sales in 2009, it re-entered the chart and has since appeared for over 900 weeks. The SACD versions bring the best of the digital versions with the MOFI SACD followed by the 1999 SACD. The MoFi absolutely kills the Sony. It seems that while expensive turntables, tone arms and phono stages are easily jusitifed in these type of. I do have two different versions of "Question of Balance". Third - Single side Japanese SACD . Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by swinger, Mar 2, 2004. They are not cheap but not the most expensive of the DCC discs. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Hello everybody. 24. In the vinyl vs. 1 kHz and 16 bits of information per sample. DANKOSKY: We'll be talking a bit about some of these new, modern ways of compressing music. Dam and Dorian75 like this. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. Vinyl has more. I own the SHM-CDs of all the early Steely Dan albums ( Can't Buy A Trill through Gaucho) and I'm more than pleased with the fidelity of these issues. I would rank each. I wrote I was somewhat pleased with the mastering. The SACD features the 2018 remix of the iconic 1977 Pink Floyd album for the first time, by long-time producer/engineer James Guthrie. e. Page 2 of 2 < Prev 1 2. The 16/44. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. ) Reel-to-reel can be better, but tapes are fragile and rare, then the players have been out of production for decades and require expensive maintenance from. There’s no shortage of non audiophile hybrid disks that are $35+ vs. Tiny imperfections in the belts or wheels of the turntable will cause more. Often times, the differences can seem quite small upon initial comparison, for example, the Beatles remasters in 24 bit vs. . The Beethoven symphony cycle on LSO Live (Haitink, 2006) is an SACD hybrid set. I am not sure if it is a great. Posted August 3, 2011. I noted underneath your review of the box set that the new SHM-SACD was a flat transfer from the analogue master. The SACD versions bring the best of the digital versions with the MOFI SACD followed by the 1999 SACD. Music41 said: ↑. Aug 15, 2012. I can hear the difference between CD and vinyl, and between CD quality and high-def audio. Tip about the 1812, the first cannon shot is the toughest of the lot to track, that one is a beastie (the Shure V 15 Type IV mounted on a SME III tonearm came closest in the day, or the Audio-Technica 440 ML). I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. 45 RPM 200 Gram Clarity Vinyl.